Efficacy and Safety of Reimbursed Orphan Medicines in Bulgaria – Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Part I)

Kamusheva, Maria and Mitov, Konstantin and Doneva, Miglena and Stoimenova, Assena and Dimitrova, Maria and Petrova, Guenka (2017) Efficacy and Safety of Reimbursed Orphan Medicines in Bulgaria – Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Part I). Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 17 (5). pp. 1-14. ISSN 24569119

[thumbnail of Kamusheva1752017JPRI34031.pdf] Text
Kamusheva1752017JPRI34031.pdf - Published Version

Download (161kB)

Abstract

Background: To make reimbursement decisions for orphan medicines the regulators need robust evidences for their efficacy and safety provided by systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

The goal of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orphan medicines included in the Positive Drug List (PDL) in Bulgaria through the application of meta-analysis.

Methods: Internet based literature search in scientific databases such as Pub Med, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register for the identification of all published clinical trials with orphan medicines Idursulfase, Sapropterin and Pasireotide was performed. The technological Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram was applied to present the flow of information during the different stages of systematic review. A set of statistical methods available in statistical software MedCalc were used to perform meta-analysis and comparison of proportions for diseases’ specific clinical parameters and adverse reactions. The studies were filtered on the basis of eligibility criteria: A clinical focus; randomized or open-label studies with clearly presented outcome variables; equal or similar time horizon; sufficient data about safety and efficacy processed with reliable statistical approaches.

Results: Fixed effect was used in patients treated with Idursulfase who experienced urticaria (p = 0.3459, 6.81%, 95% CI 3,126-12,623) and serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (p=0.0619, 21.27%, 95% CI, 14,561 - 29,345) and in patients treated with Sapropterin who experienced ADRs (P = 0.2264, 29,237%, 95% CI 20,916-38,720). Random effect was taken into account for Pasireotide effectiveness data and the percent of patients with controlled levels of urinary free cortisol (UFC) was 44.81%, 95% CI (37,506 - 56,073), which proves the difference in the effects among different samples. The results from the heterogeneity test shows that random effect for the percent of Pasireotide treated patients with nausea (р=0,2675, 51,936%, 95% CI 40.401-63,32), hyperglycemia (p=0,0504, 43.268%, 95% CI 34.217-52.662) and diarrhea (p=0.3221,58,299%, 95% CI 46.658-69.299) must be applied.

Conclusions: The aggregated data on efficacy presented by meta-analysis could be used for the conduction of pharmacoeconomic analysis for the purposes of the assessment of orphan medicines efficiency.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Journal Eprints > Medical Science
Depositing User: Managing Editor
Date Deposited: 16 May 2023 05:24
Last Modified: 27 Jan 2024 04:05
URI: http://repository.journal4submission.com/id/eprint/2004

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item