Use of the Arrhenius Equation in Kinetic Analyses and Mathematical Modeling of Rate Data Requires the Most Precise, Even Scrupulous, Application and Term Definitions

This article presents a critical analysis of the frequent practice of using the Arrhenius equation for
mathematical modeling of very many physical and chemical rate processes. This approach may also
be used to characterize the controls and mechanisms of the rate processes investigated. We also
discuss the specific form of the Arrhenius-type equation as a relationship meriting detailed
investigations. In our opinion, the use of the Arrhenius relationship often can only approximate to the
behavior of such systems, exemplified by the systems discussed below, including the work of N N
Semenov, A K Galwey, A G Mershanov, etc. We draw attention to "erroneous" experimental designs,
including the so-called "global kinetic mechanism" and other widespread uses of theoretical models
which do not necessarily represent the real situation. Such limitations in rate data analyses impact
negatively throughout this branch of science. Here we attempt to question these accepted practices
realistically and find answers to the types of studies under consideration that do not include the
misconceptions often contained (concealed) therein. Unfortunately, besides the scientific component,
various political and social applications often interfere in the process by introducing errors. This
symbiosis of delusions is considered for the example of “solid flame”, a Russian theme that may not
be familiar to English-speaking readers. The consequences of repression for scientists in connection
with their position on scientific issues are described.